|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.28 16:30:49 -
[1] - Quote
BPO's
Are Outpost component BPO's being renamed and we keep research or
Will all the BPO's be new and bought at XX date and we have to research them all?
When will the new BPO's be available? |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.28 21:22:16 -
[2] - Quote
Vyle Feelings wrote:What is the reason behind the lengthy delay in being able to retrieve impounded assets? Seems like this may discourage players from keeping all of their items in their home citadel. I know I'd be pretty miffed if I found out that my stuff was all tied up for 20 days while I wait for it to be delivered. You've already just lost your citadel, and now you can't even use your assets to rat/PvP/whatever to blow off steam.
Are there any plans to improve on the docking radius of stations to eliminate "kick" stations (station with very small dock radius such that shortly after undocking you are unable to dock again)? With these changes it's inevitable that someone's stuff is going to end up in a kick station in low or nullsec. It's not an insurmountable issue, but it'll make logistics out of an "impound station" a lot harder for people if that station is a kick, especially if its in a high traffic system. Seems a bit like kicking someone who's already down since they not only have to wait for the items, pay for them, but also then move them out of that station somehow.
Kick wont' exist, you undock and are tethered for eternity until you do something to lose tethering |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.28 22:34:15 -
[3] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:One thing I have not been able to find about citadels: How and what happens when you take them down. I don't mean destroy, I mean off-line, unanchor and scoop. It does not seem to be well covered in any blog or thread. (Just that during unanchoring, it is vulnerable).
What are the steps I would go through as the owner to take down my citadel?
How long does it take? Is the time different for different size structures, or different parts of space?
What happens to the modules, services, and rigs?
What happens to corp and player assets still in the citadel?
What happens to items on the market?
What happens to jobs in progress or in the queue?
right click - unanchor
24 hours - all sizes for now
all stay as is - rigs die if you repackage
asset recover kicks in
market items go to personal or corp hangar PRIOR to asset recovery kicking in
Jobs are killed, 99% sure inputs die |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.28 22:35:40 -
[4] - Quote
klana depp wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Kick wont' exist, you undock and are tethered for eternity until you do something to lose tethering wait what, tethering is for normal stations as well? i thought it was citadel only?
yeah, i clicked wrong quote box....
I suggest if it happens to you, you scout the location heavily before undocking anything important |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 11:38:28 -
[5] - Quote
Janeway84 wrote:wishlist, please make it so mediums can hold 1 or 2 capitals other than orca , rorqual. Not every alliance got hundreds of billions of isk in their wallets.
Why do they have to dock, why is tethering not good enough??
You do know you can tether a Titan to a medium with no issues right?? |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 11:40:15 -
[6] - Quote
Kendarr wrote:So when you undock, your are automaticly tethered?
If this is the case what happened to the "if you are scrammed you cannot dock to stop docking games?"
Both cases are 100% correct
Where you are confused is aggressing
If you undock, stay tethered and do anything to agress or get a weapons timer, you are un tethered, and typically someone would wait out the 60 sec timer and redock, well now if you are scrammed, that timer doesn't matter you are there until one ship is destroyed. |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 11:43:23 -
[7] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Lim Hiaret wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:
- Citadels in wormhole spaces do not benefit from asset safety. All items are lost when the structure is destroyed there.
I'm fine with the term destroyed, but don't let it drop as loot. Otherwise WH citadels will get far more attention than citadels elsewhere. Besides, people would trash everything anyways. This is the way it works now and the way it should remain. Personally I think there should be a way to limit destroying your own stuff during an eviction.
There is:
The plan is to try and implement this:
Once the citadel is attacked the right click -> trash it feature will cease to function
In order to get rid of assets, someone will have to get in a ship and undock, then self destruct, which leaves them wide open to being shot
That was the plan that has been talked about, they are still trying to work out feasibility |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 11:44:40 -
[8] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Just a quick question concerning what is known as the pos "r@pe cage" for wormhole space evictions...
During a eviction, it is common practice to put warp disruption bubbles around pos to prevent the residents from escaping. Before this can happen, the defences must be incapacitated so that the bubbles don't get destroyed. After this is done and the bubbles are up, the long process of reinforcing the pos can begin.
Since guns are going to be attached to the citadel, I'm assuming that the guns will become incapacitated once the citadel is reinforced. This means that both guns and the citadel will be attacked at the same time, as opposed to the current system...
So my question is, will it take more or less time to erect a "r@pe cage" around a citadel, than it would around a POS?
Much longer as the citadel is much much much much larger than a pos
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 15:24:31 -
[9] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Informative as always Kenneth, Thanks... By "much larger" I assume you mean more hit points than the pos shields (before RF) and guns combined.
On the self destruct thing, do you know if citadel mooring/tethering feature will be disabled as soon at you start self destructing?
By much larger I mean 150km across for a XL, you can probably bubble the undock, but not even sure you could bubble the whole thing. Someone can undock and stay tethered and mwd around and find an opening in the bubbles
AFAIK, when people were talking about SD in WH they made it sound like you could be shot, so I assumed tethering would break, but I can ask to make sure, if not maybe someone who is positive will answer here. |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:05:40 -
[10] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:Can medium citadels get ability to store limited, and small number of capitals. Currently you can leave in a small tower capital floating under a forcefield , this will probably be not possible in citadels.
This gets us from position where investing 100 mil in a small tower allows you to keep somewhere a capital "safe" to a position , that you can do the same investing a 7bil in a large citadel.
This will kill smaller groups operations.
Giving Medium citadel ability to dock 1-2 capitals could ease small corporations, including WH ones. This ships can be even visible on the citadel structure , so every one will know what ships are docked, or if he can dock another.
CCP change from 100mil to 7bil investment , just to keep 1 capital safe is quite big change.
For big alliances ability to dock 1-2 capitals to medium citadel will not change much.
Why do you NEED to dock those capitals?
Why is tethering not enough? You can tether up to Titans at a medium |
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
311
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 11:45:35 -
[11] - Quote
Xindi Kraid wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:I'm going to unpin the other structures threads and link them all here as we are running out of space in this forum subsection.
Well last dev post in any of them WAS some months ago. Any idea when we might hear any more thoughts on specialized structures? Hopefully you are thinking where to go next before citadels launch, so you can roll new stuff out without too much delay === I am wondering why you are treating W-space ENTIRELY differently from other areas of space where asset safety is concerned. It really isn't fair to let every single other area recover the entirety of their personal assets while people in W-space lose EVERYTHING. What makes W-space so special that it makes you lose everything? Certainly you can add some sort of asset recovery system that still results in some danger whether it exposes you, or requires you to plop a new structure. At the same time, 100% of assets back seems surprisingly generous for deep null Kenneth Feld wrote: Why do you NEED to dock those capitals?
Why is tethering not enough? You can tether up to Titans at a medium
Because it means you can't get out of your ship if you want it to remain safe.
Hmm, maybe we have different definitions of safe
Safe logging from tethered will be inherently more safe than docked, if you are docked and it gets blown up, you have to pay 15% to get your stuff back unless you build a new citadel
As far as why W-space is being treated entirely differently is because they we sooooo friggin mad when they heard their **** was going to be safe, we almost had a nuclear meltdown. They had a long talk and town hall with devs and the current policy is what came of it.
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
313
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 18:59:53 -
[12] - Quote
Poranius Fisc wrote:Xindi Kraid wrote:ThePiachu Avar wrote: Does this mean that supers and titans can dock? The keynote from Vegas was rather confusing on that part, implying that they would be only able to tether.
I am pretty sure they explicitly said, yes supercaps can dock at XLs. The art for the XL they even pointed out the avatar for scale was undocking from the station. And can get blown up too!! What happens if a pilot was logged off in an XL citadel in a Titan and the citadel was blown up with the pilot still in it? Did your corpse and the Titan get hauled away by interbus? or do you log in where the citadel was... Maybe docking at this stage isn't as safe as you think. Personally id like to See Larges and Extra Larges take the place of outposts and tie into Perma sov with the option of tearing them down if you are the owner / sov holder. It's a lot of isk to throw away for someones killmail.
Then the titan pilot will get laughed at.
You can dock, stretch your legs etc
Personally, I will undock, tether and safe log prior to logging out for the night |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
313
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 19:02:17 -
[13] - Quote
Xindi Kraid wrote:Ok then maybe flip it around, what makes BFE nullsec special that it DOES save all your **** from being blown up? === Edit: So the more I think about it, the more I think Small citadels should be a thing in order to make up for smaller sized POSes being removed. Something that goes up and comes down quick (both with the unanchor button and manually with guns) for those quick staging area and tiny corp things.
Also, it might not be a bad idea to have a medium rig that adds a captial ship maintenance array (with a limited capacity) so smaller groups that do have capitals can replace their POSes without incurring the ton of extra expense a Large requires. Alternatively add a way to tether unmanned ships (I prefer the former since it leaves less crap floating in space, though it is more limited). Either way, something to mitigate the loss of the leave your capitals floating in the POS shield gameplay that's going to be lost.
My own experience in wormholes is that nearly all capital assets end up floating in space for lack of somewhere to put it, and if you are stuck using a medium, that's still a problem since there's usually a hefty need to reship, so you can't just have someone sitting in the capital ships.
Because for all except wormholes, if you give a player the chance to use a citadel and get allt heir stuff blown up, vs using a NPC station in lowsec or NPC null, they will move their stuff and no one will use citadels for much other than small time staging
CCO will have spent years developing something that at best will get used very little and general player QOL will suffer |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
315
|
Posted - 2015.11.01 14:33:54 -
[14] - Quote
Gabriel Karade wrote:My concern is that the functionality provided by an XL-SMA (or even starbase forcefields) hasn't be replicated in this proposal, beyond the gold plated XL-Citadel option.
This is a major change to anyone who wants to be able to 'stretch their legs' for short periods outside a steel coffin. Is this intended?
We don't know yet
They sorta kinda have to dock in XL assembly arrays cause they will be built there, they should be significantly cheaper (But with less defense) than a citadel |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
316
|
Posted - 2015.11.08 20:44:44 -
[15] - Quote
Kenny Powers Zanjoahir wrote:How close can one light a cyno to a citadel?
Right now, you can light in tether range, so you are safe......
However, that is not a done deal
One other suggestion is to light in tether range, but combat ships (JF, freighter and rorqual exempt) get a 60 sec weapons timer when they jump in |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
316
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 16:35:17 -
[16] - Quote
Been asked on slack a few times, nothing concrete for answers
BPO's get converted from station to structure, complete with current research, that has been said
What about pre build components, will they get renamed as well?
So, if we build components now to be ready to build citadels on day one (minus the 3 extra BPO's for comps we need) will they get renamed to structure at the same time the BPO's get renamed or will they have some sort of NPC buy order and we need to build structure parts after that time?
Along these same lines, will current outposts requirements be changed to structures or will this be the effective end to building outposts? |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
316
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 23:08:09 -
[17] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Been asked on slack a few times, nothing concrete for answers
BPO's get converted from station to structure, complete with current research, that has been said
What about pre build components, will they get renamed as well?
So, if we build components now to be ready to build citadels on day one (minus the 3 extra BPO's for comps we need) will they get renamed to structure at the same time the BPO's get renamed or will they have some sort of NPC buy order and we need to build structure parts after that time?
Along these same lines, will current outposts requirements be changed to structures or will this be the effective end to building outposts? Yes, in fact they mentioned how "to make a profit" from the changes. If you check the blog some parts are cheaper to make now and some other cheaper after the changes.
Yeah, that is why I am asking, I will make some parts now, some later, but I don't want to make some now, then not have them convert
They mention market manipulation, but does that mean materials or comps or both, still pretty vague to invest 3-4 hundred bil into without knowing for sure. |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 18:15:06 -
[18] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Is it still the case that Citadels do not show up in the overview from range (ie. not being on grid) and instead in the probe scanner?
Yes, no , both, maybe
If you have docking rights = shows up in overview
if you do NOT have docking rights = shows up in probe scanner window
Presumably, they all show up in probe scanner window, but I am not 100% on that |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 21:00:40 -
[19] - Quote
Kynric wrote:What happens to member assets if a wormhole citadel is unanchored?
asset safety |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 21:01:39 -
[20] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Rivr Luzade wrote:Is it still the case that Citadels do not show up in the overview from range (ie. not being on grid) and instead in the probe scanner? Yes, no , both, maybe If you have docking rights = shows up in overview if you do NOT have docking rights = shows up in probe scanner window Presumably, they all show up in probe scanner window, but I am not 100% on that Having all citadel showing up as soon as you entered a system or, worse, a wormhole is really not for the best. In my opinion only those where you have docking right should show up, the rest should be at best anomalies you should be able to probe. CCP is scared of people hiding citadels in safe spot, I got that, but with grid size increase and directional scanner, we should be able to prevent that
No probing, they are in probe results window with 100% hit already - like an anomoly |
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 22:28:58 -
[21] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Kynric wrote:What happens to member assets if a wormhole citadel is unanchored? asset safety No asset safety in wormhole.
ahh, yeah, sorry, didn't notice he said wormhole
Also, if they can make it work, once attack starts no "Trash it" while docked either |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 22:29:53 -
[22] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote: No probing, they are in probe results window with 100% hit already - like an anomoly
My point was they shouldn't be 100% like an anomaly, but they should need probing.
A XL is the largest structure in game
They have never even hinted at needing probes, to bring it up now is fighting an uphill battle for sure |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 13:09:53 -
[23] - Quote
Kynric wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Kynric wrote:What happens to member assets if a wormhole citadel is unanchored? asset safety No asset safety in wormhole. ahh, yeah, sorry, didn't notice he said wormhole Also, if they can make it work, once attack starts no "Trash it" while docked either Am I the only one that sees a problem with this? It has all of the downside of a personal hangar but its much much larger. A single rouge director could trash all stored ships much more rapidly than is presently possible. This is probably not the best plan if we want wormhole space to be a healthy active area.
Well, in wormholes, there is a tactic used currently to jump in ships and self destruct to deny attackers the spoils
If you are allowed to "Trash it" once an attack starts, someone could trash everything and deny all loot, in that spirit, you can still undock and self destruct, but it takes much more time and gives loot, rather than just going away with "trash it" |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
320
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 16:14:10 -
[24] - Quote
Kynric wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:
Well, in wormholes, there is a tactic used currently to jump in ships and self destruct to deny attackers the spoils
If you are allowed to "Trash it" once an attack starts, someone could trash everything and deny all loot, in that spirit, you can still undock and self destruct, but it takes much more time and gives loot, rather than just going away with "trash it"
You cant trash an SMAs contents. The timer is not really relevant as reversing or halting an unanchor is not an option. Also we should assume that the process starts after the CEO logs for the night. The risk for wormhole pilots is mych higher than for any other pilots in the game. This concept makes running a wormhole corp harder not easier as adding directors to share the load would be a mistake.
The timer takes 24 hours to unanchor, so if it happens after CEO logs off, odds are he will login before it finishes
You can board and self destruct the contents of a SMA
You are lookign at it from a thief perspective and it will be essentially the same now
WH complained about it from a invasion perspective and that is why it is setup the way it is.
You REALLY need to listen to the wormhole roundtable to gain perspective before you ask too many more questions. It will explain alot for you |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 20:50:37 -
[25] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote: The timer takes 24 hours to unanchor, so if it happens after CEO logs off, odds are he will login before it finishes
You can board and self destruct the contents of a SMA
You are lookign at it from a thief perspective and it will be essentially the same now
WH complained about it from a invasion perspective and that is why it is setup the way it is.
You REALLY need to listen to the wormhole roundtable to gain perspective before you ask too many more questions. It will explain alot for you
Actually the unanchoring timer has not been stated anywhere, we suppose it's 24 hours like the anchoring, but no dev or dev blog stated how much time to unanchor a citadel. I really don't like how citadels are shaping up for WH: - you cannot haul a large one into an orca, forcing you to build a large from a medium one inside the wormhole - all citadels will show up in the anomalies overview, even in wormholes - there's no asset safety, of any kind, in wormholes All these "problems" with no real reward for risking so much
Large has been clafirified to be 80K like the dev blog says, so you can in fact carry it in a WH
They have also said numerous time you can build L/XL in a POS, so not sure why you would have to build a medium first.....still not sure where that myth started....Yes, i am aware of the size limitations of a pos and so is CCP. lets see what they do before we say we can't do XXX |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.17 12:11:09 -
[26] - Quote
Roberta Gastoni wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Large has been clafirified to be 80K like the dev blog says, so you can in fact carry it in a WH
They have also said numerous time you can build L/XL in a POS, so not sure why you would have to build a medium first.....still not sure where that myth started....Yes, i am aware of the size limitations of a pos and so is CCP. lets see what they do before we say we can't do XXX The problem is when pos are going to be removed like they said. Seems we all have some doubts or unclear part about the system, but I don't see a dev posting in this thread since it's creation, so far it's us talking philosophy
What part is unclear?
Devs are incredibly active on Slack and we have a very good handle on what is happening |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.18 10:43:27 -
[27] - Quote
Tyranis Marcus wrote:Been wondering. When the new small structures eventually come around for development, will the modular idea still be on the table for those? That sounded really cool.
Small structures are in the game
They are:
Mobile depot Cyno inhibitor scan inhibitor cans bubbles
There isn't going to be a small citadel |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.25 16:47:01 -
[28] - Quote
What about a XL in High sec, they could never be attacked or what? |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.25 22:41:12 -
[29] - Quote
Esrevid Nekkeg wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:Docking
- Medium Citadels: all subcapitals can dock. The Orca and Freighters can also dock.
For clarity, I presume this includes Jump-Freighters as well? CCP Ytterbium wrote:Citadels in wormhole spaces do not benefit from asset safety. All items are lost when the structure is destroyed there. I would very much like to see that all goods present in a Citadel that gets blown up in W-space has a chance to drop as loot. That said, than you for the condensed write-up on where things stand, really appreciated.
I am pretty sure that has changed and everything in a WH citadel has a chance to drop as loot
There is some discussion as far as JF, but right now, yes they are going to be allowed to dock |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
321
|
Posted - 2015.11.29 05:11:42 -
[30] - Quote
Ncc 1709 wrote:Any updates on the Oberservation arrays?
Come back in late 2017
There is so much **** that will come before they even remotely think about giant billboards |
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
332
|
Posted - 2016.02.29 03:24:03 -
[31] - Quote
Nicola Romanoff wrote:Will the construction of citadels involve any of the P4 PI products? Also, and I may have asked this before but donGÇÖt recall, once citadels come out will POS be defunked or will POS still be a thing?
The inputs for BPO's were release din a blog some months ago, yes P4 is a huge input
POS will eventually go away replaced by structures, Citadels is the first of 9 new structures that will replace POS and outposts |
|
|
|